notes on the moving image, with an interest in practice and an emphasis on the overlooked, new work and the post-cinematic
Pictures Of The Possible: LIVE AT BUSH HALL (2023)
DIE ALLSEITIG REDUZIERTE PERSӦNLICHKEIT - REDUPERS (1978)
THE ALL-ROUND REDUCED PERSONALITY - REDUPERS
- A film about a photographer in West Berlin initially structured in simple, clear movements that cut through the fluff. The photographer, Etta, is played by the filmmaker herself, Helke Sander.
- Movement 1: long, steady, unbroken tracking shots that glide through the streets of the city. The Berlin Wall, graffiti on the wall, military infrastructure, advertising billboards, shop displays, a man kicking a football down an alley past a chain link fence.
Briefly, in a window the reflection of a VW van with the side door open and the camera crew just visible, a great image of a romantic (but not ridiculous?) idea of this time and place (60s/70s West Germany) as a moment when art production was liberated, critical and experimental - as portrayed in DIE ZWEITE HEIMAT (1992). Although that series was also deeply critical, Sander's film goes even further in undercutting this idea whilst also presenting moments like this, producing an ambiguity like everyday life.
- A film about the city and a photographer working there - the film sets out her life and its material / economic aspects in detail, for instance a breakdown of (squeezed) living costs, and scenes of her working in a darkroom or waiting in cold weather for a shot she might be able to sell to the press. Equally integrated into the montage are images of the city she sees, in the tracking shots and also in the direct inclusion of the (staggering) photographs she takes, scenes that surround their creation. In the soundtrack, through a voice-over, we learn her ideas about photography, "the passion for things that are none of your business", or an interest in "the fate of a leather ball". "One should be able to choose what is none of one's business".
- When photographs are integrated into the montage the transitions from stillness to motion are near seamless - the film stocks appear as identical. The black and white suddenly becomes fluid and you get a sense of the photographer's art, picking a moment in this liquid motion, also knowing that colour is not possible. Images of the city in motion, a passing train or people dancing at a big conference. A relation with Hanne Darboven's film DER MOND IST AUFGEGANGEN (1981), which has a similar fluid-image effect, that film is like seeing through the eyes of a photographer walking around a city but without seeing any of the photographs they might have taken. In Sander's film, Etta gets too interested in the newspaper assignments she has to do for money. The effect of seeing these uncut photograph-moments doesn't produce a conclusion that the moment of the photograph is the best one; instead you see what is lost each time, people's voices for instance.
- Movement 2: scenes from everyday life presented in a minimal number of shots, usually with a fixed camera. We learn more about Etta's everyday life, where she lives, that she has a child. In some ways these scenes become a response to BLOW-UP (1966), presenting the life of a working photographer who isn't a huge success driving around the city in a Rolls Royce. The parallels between the two films are particularly clear in the scenes where Etta develops film in a darkroom or makes prints in her flat, which have a similar hypnotic effect.
- Anyway this film works with a combination of different elements, it contains fictional aspects and has a narrative but is clearly based on actual events, and the production is based entirely in real locations and appears to feature many non-actors (one of the most striking scenes sees Etta photographing a real demonstration of 6000 women marching through Berlin). Lots of films use these techniques but this one feels different, because it also acknowledges, and functions as a commentary on, the play of images in the world, and looks squarely at the power relations, down to a minute level, that underpin this. The montage of the film is itself this commentary.
- A moving picture full of other pictures, like CONVERSATIONS IN VERMONT (1969), in which Robert Frank films prints and contact sheets of his photographs being moved around, or indeed related work like the photographs of Walker Evans. He is always taking pictures of pictures. Here there is a shot of a politician making a speech in front of a huge drawing of Berlin. What is the motive for this commentary on images in Sander's film?
- The answer might come in the narrative, which begins to follow a seemingly real, though it's not clear, group of women photographers (including the protagonist) who want to use photography to show how they see the city, which is generally critical and involves photographing what the authorities would rather hide, and then feature their work on billboards like advertisers can. They also have a concept that the Wall is actually porous in some ways, for instance to gases, germs, refuse (which is taken to landfill in the East), broadcasts (Etta listens to GDR radio), and especially gazes (some streets shown are divided by the Wall to the point where you are looking into the GDR by looking at the apartment building opposite).
- So far the structure has been alternating between the tracking shots through the city (later featuring buildings among huge voids of space), and the minimalistic scenes of everyday life (for instance a small, simple scene of Etta and her boyfriend reading magazines and eating an orange).
Once this double structure has been established, it begins to be subverted as the characters carry out their art project, which is based on a subversion of public space and market time. The tracking shots of the city now grow to include the characters from the other scenes, carrying all their tools. They mount a huge print of one of their photographs so it can be carried around and installed in different parts of the city. There's an astonishing sequence that begins with one of Etta's photographs, then cuts seamlessly to a moving image shot of the exact same composition, which is slowly entered by two of the characters carrying a big print of the same photograph into the frame; all the levels of the film collide.
They also build a platform up to the top of the Wall with a curtain that fills the frame and is drawn back to reveal the streets of East Berlin. The characters refuse to ignore the Wall, and so does the film. Within this installation sequence there are also more details of everyday life, more eating orange, an argument about having children around, being exhausted at the end of the day, and a note in the voice-over that a male friend makes fun of their project. A multitude of differing points of view throughout.
- Then the excitement is over and the film returns to everyday life. The shots in this film are expertly exposed like photographs, there's a scene in a karate class where the whole frame is just a series of moving angles in variations of light grey, or an apartment at night completely black but for one white light bulb. There's a great quote Edda recites in the voice-over from Christa Wolf about how each day is made of points which can be connected if you're lucky, but fall apart if you're not and require lots of effort to have meaning. As if to echo this there's then a scene that cuts from Beethoven on the soundtrack to a field recording of GDR pop music on the car radio.
- Things wind down and the women's group get into trouble because they want to photograph the city rather than specifically focus on women's conditions within it, and so are attacked from all sides. There are all kinds of problems documented with getting funding from people, with the state, with business, as well as being treated fairly or taken seriously in general (Etta has to wrangle with editors who keep printing her photographs without paying her, for instance), all issues that still feel pertinent.
- Rather than a simple dichotomy of dramatisation and documentary, this film constructs a system where there are several projects in motion; the structuring of the film, the photography projects (which are actually carried out even if they are fictions) that the film documents, the project of the GDR and West Berlin within it, and Helke Sander's own life and projects - she became a leading figure in the women's movement after making a famous speech at the height of the unrest in 1968. Rivette's idea of making something happen in the world rather than a film, then documenting it, a structure that reaches outside itself and engages with the world, or the process of imaging the world. A film that catches a moment in time through ideas as simple as incorporating snippets of radio broadcasts or political graffiti. You're also left room to think, wondering what in the film is part of each of these different projects, a scene with a rude magazine editor - is it a re-enaction?
- Some of these questions are cleared up in the final shot which sees Etta wandering off again down a long street, with another fragment from Christa Wolf that strongly suggests the events of the film are based on an actual diary, while adding a little distance by noting all the problems that using that process might entail.
aviary: Bumping Into Andrew Salkey
A series of chance encounters over a number of years.
- First Encounter: DON'T LOOK BACK (1967) in which a camera crew follows Bob Dylan at the height of fame, accompanied by an entourage, through a series of strange encounters with different people in the mid-60s UK. The most famous of these meetings are those with rival musicians and hostile journalists, but the value of the film is in the smaller, chance fragments that catch a moment in time, and the context of the place, around the music tour that is the intended subject.
A group of excited kids somewhere in Merseyside yell for Dylan to come out of a hotel, but when he appears they are lost for something to say. They ask the perennial question "Have you any brothers or sisters?".
Later the High Sheriff's Lady invites the entourage to stay at her mansion house in May, after she becomes the Lord Mayor.
A strange atmosphere throughout, tired out and strangely gentle, rainy landscapes glimpsed from big shiny cars, or old fashioned railway trains with the tall seats, through the glass old Northern townscapes are churned through Harold Wilson's white heat, becoming shiny and new.
Then there's a moment where Dylan meets another journalist, but there is something different about this encounter. This journalist speaks in a clipped, refined way and says he is producing a program for West African listeners for the BBC. There's something odd in his manner, using phrases like "The questions are four in number" before listing each interview question in full before actually asking them.
- Second Encounter: later, looking for images for an essay on a book by Samuel Selvon, who stands on the left of this photograph by the filmmaker Horace Ové. In fact, though he is difficult to recognise behind glasses, hat and beard, on the right is the same man from the scene in DON'T LOOK BACK. Somewhere between the second and third encounters, this link is made, and this man is Andrew Salkey.
- Third Encounter: walking into a new friend's flat which feels as though it's by the sea, though it's really at the top of a hill in South London. At the top floor of the building, it feels like being high up in a sailing boat, rolling around on the sea, you can hear the wind. On the bookshelf is a copy of HAVANA JOURNAL (1971) by Andrew Salkey. Flicking through, this book is about a trip to Castro's Cuba to attend the Cultural Congress of Havana held in 1968. Salkey goes along with C.L.R. James and the publisher John LaRose, who stands next to Selvon in the middle of the photograph from the second encounter.
According to this article on the George Padmore Institute site, the three writers were directly engaged in the debates at the international conference, questioning the ideas that formed the basis of the discussions, and even holding their own independent meeting in a theatre away from the main venue (a marked contrast to Dylan's own disengagement with straight-ahead politics? By this time the folk singer was in self-imposed exile, no longer touring and living in the countryside).
- Fourth Encounter: later, near the same flat, walking into a tiny bookshop. There's a copy of ANANCY'S SCORE (1973) by Andrew Salkey. This book features a series of linked short stories which use the folk character of Anancy, who features in West African and Caribbean folklore. The stories are collages of themes and language, combining references to old and new narratives, for instance placing references to the garden of Eden and the atom bomb in the same story, and using a writing style that contains a multitude of slang elements.
There are parallels with Bob Dylan's use of structures, characters and narratives from folk stories in combination with different sensibilities (rock music or slang or the city itself as a setting, that whole feeling of 50s/60s American underground culture). There are also some overlaps in ideas and outlook, one passage reading for instance
"It happened now one daytime when Brother Sun was stretching far up into the big blue, Brother Anancy and his wife were walking up and down the banana field in the place called The Beginning. You might think that the name of this garden is a funny coincidence of a name, but that is the personal business of all names. Names must lead people on and cause a lot of botheration. Believe me: there's no other way that names and tags can serve any purpose, particularly when people looking up to names and tags, and using them to settle affairs for all time. People trap names and treat them as final judges."
The book also features illustrations by Errol Lloyd, a Jamaican-born artist who was part of the Caribbean Artists Movement.
- Fifth Encounter: washed up, walking down the street one day, slightly lost, unsure of anything that is happening. There's suddenly a main road and another bookshop. Something about it calls out, and it produces two little artefacts. The first is an anthology for schools called Caribbean Prose, edited together by Andrew Salkey. There are stories by George Lamming and Edward Braithwaite. The second is a postcard of Victoria Square, Birmingham, 1932.
- Slowly putting together a sense of the work of Andrew Salkey. According to his obituary by Stuart Hall, he was born in Panama, went to school in Jamaica, and eventually settled in London, also working in Massachusetts. He created an enormous body of work, including an epic poem about the history of Jamaica that took two decades to write, and through working at the BBC, editing anthologies, working in publishing, and helping to start the Caribbean Artists Movement, he was instrumental in supporting and popularising work by Caribbean writers. According to the British Library, "He was jokingly labelled ‘Chief Recorder of Caribbean authors and their whereabouts’ by close friend Sam Selvon".
- What is there to say about this little journey? Encountering Salkey in all these different places, it seems like he is still travelling around and still spreading the word. Looking back at DON'T LOOK BACK, especially after looking at the great stories in ANANCY'S SCORE, the encounter between Salkey and Dylan seems a terrible waste, a missed opportunity, at best a failure of communication and circumstance, at worst something more sinister, potentially even ignorant, malicious.
- Happy times trailing around bookshops with friends, discovering all the famous and rebellious writers, but almost exactly at the same time finding by chance a copy of THE LONELY LONDONERS by Samuel Selvon, a quieter doorway into an incredible, seemingly endless constellation of writers and artists that is still quite difficult to access, slowly finding more old books by C.L.R. James, George Lamming, Joan Riley.
- travelling through texts, which travel through fictional places and representations of real places, or travel through real places as books, setting down on shelves, or travel with people, C.L.R. James losing Nan Milton's manuscript of her John Maclean biography somewhere in the underground, all the text put together is a big city full of chance encounters, encounters with histories that are overlaid back on the real city, a place to read in the park on the bus or with a friend, finding texts with friends and reading to each other, starting journeys through the places of texts and through real places that are pulled back through texts that are filtered back through places, texts begin the journey or come along and change it, and vice versa, you travel between the islands of the text and the place and the journey, all the text put together is an ocean crossed by readers and writers who crossed real oceans,